Optimizing Monitoring of Pulmonary Airway Interventions With Digital Tomosynthesis

Introduction

With its wide availability, low cost, and low radiation dose, the chest radiograph remains the most performed radiographic procedure worldwide. Despite its ease of use, the chest radiograph has diagnostic limitations. The 2D planar acquisition of the chest radiograph limits the spatial delineation of the complex 3D structures within the thorax. The wide latitude and dynamic range of the chest radiograph can also preclude the differentiation of the complex tissue pathologies contained within the thorax.1

More recent advances in the detection of cardiothoracic disease have been made possible with the incorporation of flat-panel detector technology in chest radiography. The flat-panel detector enables several advances: it improves contrast independent of exposure level, the availability of image data in electronic form, and the ability to acquire multiple images in rapid sequence.1 Sequential image acquisition capability made possible with flat-panel detectors has enabled 2 important technologies in chest radiography: dual-energy subtraction radiography and digital tomosynthesis.

While first proposed as a technology in the 1950s, dual-energy radiography was only first performed in the 1980s.2 Early literature with dual-energy radiography demonstrated improved detection of lung nodules compared with conventional radiography.3 Utilizing flat-panel technology, dual-energy subtraction was enabled with a sequential dual exposure of high- and low-energy x-ray acquisitions.4 Dual-energy radiography has also been reported to better delineate calcified from noncalcified structures.5 This improved delineation has also enabled a better depiction of a large range of calcified cardiovascular structures.6

The rapid sequential acquisitions made possible with flat-panel technology have more recently enabled the adoption of another advanced imaging technique, digital tomosynthesis. This advanced application has demonstrated improved detection of breast cancer,7 orthopedic pathology,8 and urological imaging.9 In the thorax, digital tomosynthesis has demonstrated improved pulmonary nodule detection.10 Further reports have compared pulmonary nodule detection between conventional radiography, dual-energy radiography, and digital tomosynthesis. Digital tomosynthesis demonstrated clearly superior performance compared with dual-energy and conventional acquisitions.11 Simultaneously, chest tomosynthesis has the radiation dose equivalent of 2 posteroanterior and lateral x-rays; therefore, the average dose of a digital tomosynthesis examination is 0.3-0.4 mSv. Compared with a diagnostic chest CT, typically 4-8 mSv, the average chest digital tomosynthesis dose is 5%-10% that of a diagnostic chest CT.

Advancements in dual-energy radiography and digital tomosynthesis have also further improved visualization and evaluation of the airways.12, 13 The focus of this review is the enhanced capabilities of digital tomosynthesis in the assessment of suspected airway disease. In addition to effectively detecting airway stenosis, digital tomosynthesis proves valuable in the evaluation and management of patients with suspected airway disease, including the improved detection of airway stents and endobronchial valves (EBV).

ADVERTISEMENT

Postintubation Tracheal Stenosis

During the peak of the COVID-19 global pandemic, reports from regions that were more profoundly affected by COVID-19 found that up to 88% of critically ill patients with COVID-19 required endotracheal intubation for a median of 18 days.14 The complications of prolonged or repeated intubation and endotracheal cuff overinflation have been well documented, including tracheal ischemia, ulceration, and necrosis.15 Such tracheal injury can lead to tracheal stenosis, resulting in chronic or progressive respiratory symptoms after extubation. Treatment options for tracheal stenosis include endoscopic balloon dilation and open surgery with partial tracheal resection and anastomosis. Mattioli et al highlighted the advantage of balloon dilation in patients with COVID-19 over the more invasive approach of open surgery.16 After treatment, patients undergo serial endoscopic examinations to assess patency and integrity of their airways. Diagnostic imaging has a role in assessing the airway in the periprocedural setting, both for the detection of tracheal stenosis, preprocedural planning, and postprocedural follow-up. Cross-sectional imaging with CT is often used to assess the severity of tracheal stenosis and is complementary to the more definitive but invasive diagnostic approach of direct endoscopic evaluation. Additionally, the use of dynamic CT and MRI has been described for further characterizing tracheal stenosis.17 However, digital tomosynthesis can be valuable in this setting, particularly when cross-sectional imaging is not available ( Figure 1 ).

Figure 1. p class="p ">Adult with COVID-19 pneumonia. Coronal CT (A) in minimum intensity projection at the level of the trachea and central airway demonstrates tracheal distention secondary to overinflated endotracheal tube cuff (arrow). Postextubation radiograph (B) is suboptimal in the assessment of the trachea due to overlapping mediastinal and osseous structures. Digital tomosynthesis (C) centered at the trachea reveals severe narrowing of the tracheal lumen (arrow). Preintervention bronchoscopy (D) confirms a smooth, circumferential tracheal stricture.
ADVERTISEMENT

Malignant Bronchial Stenosis

Central airway stenting is a common, minimally invasive interventional pulmonary procedure performed to maintain airway patency in patients with malignant airway pathologies, including tumor invasion into the airway lumen, as well as extrinsic mass compression of the airway.18 While not curative, airway stenting relieves symptoms and improves the quality of life for the patient. Conventional radiography is often the initial imaging requested to assess the thoracic anatomy. However, due to overlapping mediastinal anatomic structures, conventional radiographs have a relatively low sensitivity for detecting central airway pathology, often resulting in suboptimal evaluation of the airways.19 Digital tomosynthesis provides an alternative or intermediate step in detecting malignant airway stenosis and determining the integrity of the airways ( Figure 2 ). Studies evaluating inter-reader diagnostic performance found increased sensitivity and accuracy for detecting airway pathologies using digital tomosynthesis over conventional radiography.13

Figure 2.

Adult with malignant bronchial stenosis. Chest radiograph (A) demonstrates an irregular, lobular, mass-like density projecting over the right perihilar region (arrow). Note the limited visualization of the mainstem and segmental bronchi secondary to underpenetration. Digital tomosynthesis (B) improves visualization of underlying severe stenosis of the right-sided tracheobronchial structures (white arrow). There is moderate stenosis of the left mainstem bronchus (black arrow).

ADVERTISEMENT

Postoperative Airway Complications

Lung Transplantation

Patients with end-stage lung disease undergo an extensive assessment of transplant eligibility prior to receiving a lung transplant. Radiologists are becoming increasingly more involved in the care of these patients both before and after transplantation. In addition to assessing post-transplant infection or sequelae of transplant rejection, assessing the airway anastomosis site is critical. Central airway stenosis at the anastomotic site between the donor and recipient mainstem bronchi is one of the common post-transplant complications.20 Placement of an airway stent is an important treatment option for post-transplant anastomotic strictures. However, complications may occur after the stent is placed, and follow-up imaging can help assess the possibility of stent migration and/or obstruction ( Figure 3 ). In 1 series, stent-related complications were seen in 23% to 34% of patients.21 In another study by Kim et al, evaluating patients undergoing airway stent placement, 47% required 2 or more procedures, with stent-related complications occurring in the first 2 to 3 months after the initial procedure.22 Digital tomosynthesis can change the treatment plan without the need for additional CT imaging.23

Figure 3. p class="p ">Adult lung transplant patient who underwent right mainstem bronchus stent placement for postprocedural bronchial stenosis. Conventional radiograph (A ) shows poor visualization of the right mainstem bronchus owing to overlying anatomy and sternal wires. Digital tomosynthesis (B) demonstrates markedly improved visualization of the stented right mainstem bronchus (black arrow), which appears intact.

Endobronchial Valve Placement

Patients with refractory chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) owing to severe lung hyperinflation and air trapping may benefit from minimally invasive procedures, which aim to selectively reduce lung volume, improve lung function, and relieve symptoms. In fact, the placement of an EBV is a standard-of-care treatment option for advanced COPD in many countries.24 After placement of an EBV, serial imaging follow-up is necessary to assess lung volume changes in addition to postprocedural complications. A pneumothorax is a common complication, with some reporting a 15% to 25% occurrence rate.24 However, making the distinction between a bulla or pneumatocele, which has been shown to resolve on its own,25 and a pneumothorax, for which the valves may need to be removed, may impact the patient’s clinical and treatment course. Conventional radiography may not have the resolution to definitively visualize the thin-walled cyst of a pneumatocele.26 However, by scrolling through slices provided by digital tomosynthesis, the outline of the pneumatocele can be better appreciated ( Figure 4 ).

Figure 4.

Adult with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease following left upper lobe EBV placement. Conventional chest radiograph (A) following left upper lobe EBV placement. Postprocedural digital tomosynthesis image (B) following EBV placement enhances demonstration of left apical lucency consistent with postprocedural pneumatocele (black arrow). Note improved visualization of the EBV within the left upper lobe airways (white arrow). Coronal chest CT reformation (C) following EBV placement confirms the digital tomosynthesis diagnosis of postprocedural pneumatocele.

ADVERTISEMENT

Limitations of Digital Tomosynthesis in Thoracic Imaging

The diagnostic value and added benefit of digital tomosynthesis in the monitoring of patients with a variety of airway pathologies and airway interventions are clear. However, digital tomosynthesis technology has limitations. Current digital tomosynthesis platforms are not portable, precluding their use in the intensive care unit setting. Additionally, blurring artifact may occur in patients who have difficulty cooperating with the examination, given that the acquisition requires a 10-second breath hold ( Figure 5 ); however, we are not aware of specific literature indicating a significant rate of nondiagnostic digital tomosynthesis examinations.

Figure 5.

Limitations of digital tomosynthesis. Digital tomosynthesis centered over the trachea and central airways shows blurring artifact owing to patient motion during the acquisition. As a result, there is poor delineation of the contour and luminal integrity of the trachea and central airways.

ADVERTISEMENT

Conclusion

The expanding scope and advances in the field of interventional pulmonology have paralleled the growth of advanced imaging techniques to better evaluate the results of interventions, including removable silicone stents,27 balloon/laser ablation,28 and EBV therapy,29 and have increased the opportunity for accurate, noninvasive monitoring of these interventions.

These technological advances are not without their own complexities, and patients undergoing airway intervention commonly return for follow-up evaluation for complications. Due to the inherent limitations of standard film-screen and digital radiographic techniques, CT has been used to monitor the preprocedural and postoperative appearance of interventional pulmonology techniques.30 While the rapid acquisition and advanced 3D capabilities of modern-day CT have clear advantages, digital radiographic technologies, with significantly lower cost and radiation dose, offer a potentially attractive alternative for the patient with suspected airway disease.13, 31

In patients undergoing silicon stent placement, digital tomosynthesis demonstrated clear superiority to conventional radiography in the detection of these stents and associated complications.22 Recent experience demonstrates the significant diagnostic value of digital tomosynthesis in the post-lung transplant patient with endobronchial stents.

Additional opportunities for therapy monitoring with digital tomosynthesis exist in patients undergoing EBV therapy. Well-recognized complications in patients include postprocedural pneumothoraces, EBV migration, and airway granulation/stenosis.32 Early results suggest digital tomosynthesis may also improve pneumothorax detection in patients undergoing EBV therapy.33

Digital tomosynthesis has advantages over plain radiography in the detection of airway disease, and its role in the effective, low-cost and low-radiation-dose monitoring of these therapies. Future advances in pulmonary intervention will continue to define the important role of digital tomosynthesis in this growing population.

ADVERTISEMENT

References

1. McAdams HP Samei E Dobbins J Tourassi GD Ravin CE . Recent advances in chest radiography. Radiology. 2006; 241 ( 3 ): 663 - 683. 10.1148/radiol.2413051535
2. Kido S Ikezoe J Naito H et al. Single-exposure dual-energy chest images with computed radiography. Evaluation with simulated pulmonary nodules. Invest Radiol. 1993; 28 ( 6 ): 482 - 487.
3. Kelcz F Zink FE Peppler WW et al. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994; 162 ( 2 ): 271 - 278. 10.2214/ajr.162.2.8310908
4. Gilkeson RC Sachs PB . Dual energy subtraction digital radiography: technical considerations, clinical applications, and imaging pitfalls. J Thorac Imaging. 2006; 21 ( 4 ): 303 - 313. 10.1097/01.rti.0000213646.34417.be
5. Fischbach F Freund T Röttgen R et al. Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector: revealing calcified chest abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 181 ( 6 ): 1519 - 1524. 10.2214/ajr.181.6.1811519
6. Ansari-Gilani K Tandon YK Jordan DW et al. Dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: application in cardiovascular imaging. J Thorac Imaging. 2020; 35 ( 3 ): W75 - W81. 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000472
7. Rafferty EA Park JM Philpotts LE et al. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. Radiology. 2013; 266 ( 1 ): 104 - 113: 104. 10.1148/radiol.12120674
8. Gazaille RE 3rd Flynn MJ Page W 3rd Finley S van Holsbeeck M . Technical innovation: digital tomosynthesis of the hip following intra-articular administration of contrast. Skeletal Radiol. 2011; 40 ( 11 ): 1467 - 1471. 10.1007/s00256-011-1247-7
9. Neisius A Astroza GM Wang C et al. Digital tomosynthesis: a new technique for imaging nephrolithiasis. specific organ doses and effective doses compared with renal stone protocol noncontrast computed tomography. Urology. 2014; 83 ( 2 ): 282 - 287. 10.1016/j.urology.2013.10.004
10. Kim JH Lee KH Kim K-T et al. Comparison of digital tomosynthesis and chest radiography for the detection of pulmonary nodules: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol. 2016; 89 ( 1068 ): 20160421. 10.1259/bjr.20160421
11. Dobbins JT McAdams HP Sabol JM et al. Multi-institutional evaluation of digital tomosynthesis, dual-energy radiography, and conventional chest radiography for the detection and management of pulmonary nodules. Radiology. 2017; 282 ( 1 ): 236 - 250: 236. 10.1148/radiol.2016150497
12. Odagiri K Fujiwara T Andoh K et al. Single exposure dual-energy subtraction radiography of the upper airways using computed radiography. Acta Radiol. 1992; 33 ( 3 ): 281 - 283.
13. Choo JY Lee KY Yu A et al. A comparison of digital tomosynthesis and chest radiography in evaluating airway lesions using computed tomography as a reference. Eur Radiol. 2016; 26 ( 9 ): 3147 - 3154. 10.1007/s00330-015-4127-z
14. Tapias LF Lanuti M Wright CD et al. COVID-19-related post-intubation tracheal stenosis: early experience with surgical treatment. Ann Surg. 2022; 275 ( 1 ): e271 - e273: e271. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004884
15. Gaspar M da C Maximiano LF Minamoto H Otoch JP . Tracheal stenosis due to endotracheal tube cuff hyperinflation: a preventable complication. Autops Case Rep. 2019; 9 ( 1 ): e2018072. 10.4322/acr.2018.072
16. Mattioli F Marchioni A Andreani A et al. Post-intubation tracheal stenosis in COVID-19 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021; 278 ( 3 ): 847 - 848. 10.1007/s00405-020-06394-w
17. Parshin VD Koroleva IM Mishchenko MA . Evolution of diagnostic methods for cicatrical tracheal stenosis and tracheomalacia. Khir Z im NI Pirogova. 2016; 5: 17. 10.17116/hirurgia2016517-25
18. Murgu SD Egressy K Laxmanan B et al. Central airway obstruction: benign strictures, tracheobronchomalacia, and malignancy-related obstruction. Chest. 2016; 150 ( 2 ): 426 - 441. 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.001
19. Oberg C Folch E Santacruz JF . Management of malignant airway obstruction. AME Med J. 2018; 3: 115 - 115. 10.21037/amj.2018.11.06
20. Kim SJ Azour L Hutchinson BD et al. Imaging course of lung transplantation: from patient selection to postoperative complications. Radiographics. 2021; 41 ( 4 ): 1043 - 1063. 10.1148/rg.2021200173
21. Guibert N Saka H Dutau H . Airway stenting: technological advancements and its role in interventional pulmonology. Respirology. 2020; 25 ( 9 ): 953 - 962. 10.1111/resp.13801
22. Kim B-G Chung MJ Jeong B-H Kim H . Diagnostic performance of digital tomosynthesis to evaluate silicone airway stents and related complications. J Thorac Dis. 2021; 13 ( 10 ): 5627 - 5637: 5627. 10.21037/jtd-21-1032
23. Banifadel M Vonau M Young B et al. “Digital tomosynthesis” as a technique for the evaluation of endobronchial stents in lung transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2022; 106 ( 12 ): 2462 - 2465. 10.1097/TP.0000000000004248
24. Klooster K Slebos DJ . Endobronchial valves for the treatment of advanced emphysema. Chest. 2021; 159 ( 5 ): 1833 - 1842. 10.1016/j.chest.2020.12.007
25. Skowasch D Pizarro C Valipour A et al. Endobronchial valve-induced pneumatocele: a case report. Pneumologie. 2013; 67 ( 11 ): 639 - 640. 10.1055/s-0033-1344640
26. Cant J Snoeckx A Behiels G Parizel PM Sijbers J . Can portable tomosynthesis improve the diagnostic value of bedside chest X-ray in the intensive care unit? A proof of concept study. Eur Radiol Exp. 2017; 1 ( 1 ): 20. 10.1186/s41747-017-0021-6
27. Shin B Kim K Jeong B-H et al. Clinical implications of differentiating between types of post-tracheostomy tracheal stenosis. J Thorac Dis. 2017; 9 ( 11 ): 4413 - 4423. 10.21037/jtd.2017.10.99
28. Chan CL Frauenfelder CA Foreman A et al. Surgical management of airway stenosis by radiofrequency coblation. J Laryngol Otol. 2015; 129 ( s1 ): S21 - S26. 10.1017/S0022215114002783
29. Valipour A Burghuber OC . An update on the efficacy of endobronchial valve therapy in the management of hyperinflation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2015; 9 ( 6 ): 294 - 301. 10.1177/1753465815599693
30. Ferretti GR Kocier M Calaque O et al. Follow-up after stent insertion in the tracheobronchial tree: role of helical computed tomography in comparison with fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13 ( 5 ): 1172 - 1178. 10.1007/s00330-003-1820-0
31. Chou S-HS Kicska GA Pipavath SN Reddy GP . Digital tomosynthesis of the chest: current and emerging applications. Radiographics. 2014; 34 ( 2 ): 359 - 372. 10.1148/rg.342135057
32. Koster TD Klooster K Ten Hacken NHT van Dijk M Slebos D-J . Endobronchial valve therapy for severe emphysema: an overview of valve-related complications and its management. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2020; 14 ( 12 ): 1235 - 1247. 10.1080/17476348.2020.1813571
33. Avasarala SK Young B Gilkeson RC . Enhanced postbronchoscopic lung volume reduction pneumothorax detection with digital tomosynthesis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023; 207 ( 6 ): e47 - e48. 10.1164/rccm.202206-1028IM

Citation

Hahn L, Sullivan S, Young B, Howard NS, Youngblood L, Thaler K, Sposato J, Uram V, Gilkeson R, Godel A. Optimizing Monitoring of Pulmonary Airway Interventions With Digital Tomosynthesis. Appl Radiat Oncol. 2024;(4):20 - 26.
doi:10.37549/AR-D-24-0024

August 1, 2024