Interventional Radiology—Outpatient hemodialysis vascular access: Cost-efficient clinical care

pdf path

Image Gallery

According to the 2013 United States Renal Data System (USRDS) report, the prevalence of adult and pediatric end-stage renal disease(ESRD) in the United States is estimated to be just over 615,000, with 1,901 adult and 15.2 pediatric ESRD patients per million in the general population.1

This reflects a yearly continued rate of increase, with a slightly lower growth rate between 2010 and 2011. While prevalence varies by comorbid disease states, age, and ethnicity, the collective ESRD population consumes a significant amount of healthcare economic resources.USRDS estimates the 2011 Medicare expenditures for ESRD care was $34.3 billion, accounting for 6.3% of the total Medicare budget. 38%of ESRD Medicare funds were for inpatient services, 35% for outpatient services, 19% for physicians, 4.3% for skilled nursing, and 2.8%for other related healthcare services.1

Placement, maintenance, and care of hemodialysis (HD) vascular access (VA) are major sources of expenditure for the ESRD population.In keeping with the National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-DOQI) guidelines for vascular access,2 as reported by the most recent Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study,3 62% of hemodialysis patients in the United States utilize an arteriovenous fistula (AVF), while 19.5% have a catheter and 18.5% have an arteriovenous graft (AVG) for VA. Placing a new ESRD patient on dialysis may cost approximately $34 million, with a significant portion going to creating this access. When considering yearly maintenance and care of dysfunctional access and VA events, costs may exceed $2.5 billion per year. This reflects at least 10% of hemodialysis Medicare expenditures.1

Advantages of outpatient vascular access clinical care

Compared to a hospital setting, outpatient vascular access endovascular care has been shown to be more cost-effective while exceeding hospitals in several quality performance metrics. An outpatient vascular access center combines patient education, diagnostic imaging, and endovascular interventional therapies for comprehensive focused VA care of adult and pediatric ESRD patients on HD. Healthcare services include 1) vascular mapping; 2) percutaneous transcatheter angioplasty (PTA) and/or stent placement for arterial and/or venous obstructive disease in an AVF or AVG; 3) PTA for AVF maturation; 4) shunt mechanical and/or pharmacological thrombectomy; 5) endovascular treatment of arterial steal; 6) management of accessory venous branches; and 7) placement of temporary and tunneled HD catheters. Routine scheduled clinical and diagnostic evaluations and appropriate pre-emptive endovascular interventions are standard for maintenance of VA viability and prevention of significant shunt dysfunctions and other secondary complications. In the outpatient VA clinical care model, VA complications, related hospitalizations, patient mortality, and costs are lower compared to a hospital based practice.4 Preventive maintenance through comprehensive care can reduce inpatient hospitalizations, which in turn can reduce healthcare expenditures.5

Excelling with the outpatient VA model

The success of outpatient VA care has resulted in a competitive landscape in both urban and rural markets. In the era of bundled and capitated payment structures and reduced reimbursements, excelling in an outpatient VA practice requires effective use of all available resources.This includes a skilled and knowledgeable staff functioning at high team capacity. DOQI guidelines should be utilized and monitored through continuous quality improvement to achieve and maintain superior quality performance. Patient and staff education, multidisciplinary cross-collaboration, and strong communication are essential to the flow of information, implementation of proper management plans, and patient satisfaction. Inventory should be efficiently managed to keep costs low, while clinical care and procedures should be appropriately documented and coded. The latter will ensure steady revenue streams and low days in collection. Finally, imaging modalities should be integrated into clinical care for optimization of the workflow.

Many centers utilize duplex arterial and venous sonography for vascular mapping and routine shunt surveillance. Sonography can also be utilized to evaluate a shunt and its peripheral venous drainage prior to an endovascular procedure.VA centers with the ability to offer computed tomographic angiography (CTA) can further optimize the workflow. Upper extremity CTA may be indicated in a VA patient when 1) duplex sonography is non-diagnostic; 2) the clinical presentation and ultrasound exam yield an indeterminate understanding of the nature of inflow disease, outflow disease, or both; and 3) there is a need to evaluate central veins (Figure 1).6 Complete inflow and outflow shunt territories can be imaged with a volume of contrast medium comparable to that required for diagnostic catheter angiography. CTA may find there is no viable endovascular solution and that surgery is required. Alternatively, it may help plan an endovascular procedure and reduce the extent of pre-intervention diagnostic catheter angiography (Figure 2). This strategy will reduce procedure time, radiation exposure, and supplies, leading to improved patient safety and lower costs. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is also an option fora vascular access center. MRA may be performed with non-gadolinium angiographic sequences or gadolinium-enhanced angiographic sequences in an appropriate patient utilizing a non-contraindicated agent for ESRD patients.

With sound financial and capital management and efficient operational management, advanced non-invasive angiography and other innovative diagnostic and endovascular strategies can be successfully incorporated into an outpatient VA practice. Continuous quality improvement and a commitment to service innovation are fundamental to the mission of maximizing ESRD patient care, maximizing shunt patency, reducing ESRD healthcare expenditures, and providing benefit to the community stakeholders.

References

  1. USRDS 2013 Annual Data Report: Atlas of chronic kidney disease and end stage renal disease in the United States (2013).
  2. The Vascular Access Work Group. NFK-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997; 30 (Suppl 3):S150-91.
  3. Annual Report of the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study: Hemodialysis Data 1997-2011. Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor.
  4. Dobson A, El-Gamil AM, Shimer M. Clinical and economic value of performing dialysis vascular access procedures in a freestanding office-based center as compared with the hospital outpatient department among Medicare ESRD beneficiaries. Semin Dial. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(5):624-32.
  5. Sawant A, Mills PK, Dhingra H. Increased length of stay and costs associated with inpatient management of vascular access failures. Semin Dial. 2013 Jan-Feb;26(1):106-10.
  6. Hellinger J.C., Epelman M., Geoffrey D. Rubin. Upper extremity CT angiography: State of the art techniques and applications in 2010. Radiol Clin North. 2010; 48(2):397-421.
Back To Top

Interventional Radiology—Outpatient hemodialysis vascular access: Cost-efficient clinical care.  Appl Radiol. 

About the Author

Jeffrey C. Hellinger, MD, MBA, FACC; Zain Kassam, MD; Nicole Mendelson

Jeffrey C. Hellinger, MD, MBA, FACC; Zain Kassam, MD; Nicole Mendelson

Dr. Hellinger, Dr. Kassam, and Ms. Mendelson are with the New York Cardiovascular Institute at Lenox Hill Radiology and Medical Imaging in New York, NY.



Copyright © Anderson Publishing 2016