It’s the year 2023. A patient-customer steps up to the counter of the IV Contrast Bistro, shouting out the following order: “I’ll have one single-shot IV contrast low-dose CT with coronal reconstruction images, please.”
The future? Possibly.
Consumers are taking an increasingly active role in making their own health care choices. Whether they conduct their research via the internet or by flipping through shiny pages of women’s magazines, patients want more say. They also want their imaging faster, cheaper, and safer—and all of it right now.
Gone are the days of the heavy film jackets, teeming with unnecessary CT exams, which we as residents could barely lift from the old wooden countertops of the reading rooms. Patients and radiologists alike now need to take ownership of the radiation doses administered with each CT exam.
During my first CT abdomen case review, my attending radiologist showed me an oval paraaortic structure, and tried to convince me that it represented an abnormally enlarged lymph node—only to present me with a contrast-enhanced image of the same structure, confirming a beautifully opacified normal inferior vena cava.
“Our job as radiologists is to detect disease, not to give a faulty diagnosis (in this case lymphoma) to an otherwise healthy patient,” my attending said. If we had misdiagnosed the condition as lymphoma, we could have exposed the patient to unnecessary treatments and more unnecessary radiation via follow-up CT exams. We could have potentially created that lymphoma.
The take-away message is: Take ownership of your role as a diagnostic radiologist.
We seem to have lost that function somewhere along the way, as our practices have become busier, and we have become more akin to assembly-line workers under the gun to boost productivity.
Remember, we are the imaging experts and, whenever possible, we should advise our physician colleagues how to order “smarter” and, consequently, how to save our patients from excessive radiation dose. Now that ionizing radiation has officially been deemed a carcinogen, we have that obligation now more than ever. Remember to consider ultrasound as a viable option and to perform CT examinations judiciously.
Here are some situations where we should assert our role as the imaging experts:
If you are faced with a request for a follow-up CT for a simple renal cyst, which has already been proven as such on a prior renal CT exam, suggest that the referring doctor have the patient follow up with a surveillance ultrasound. We should be advising our primary care colleagues when needed to save our patients from excessive radiation dose. Although the effects of radiation are felt to be stochastic, it is agreed that avoiding unnecessary radiation dose is a prudent course of action.
Give a call out to the referring doctor to inform him or her that the patient has already had the test a few days ago, and clarify the need to repeat the exam, if any.
Now, back to the future: The barista replies: “Shall I make that one a single-shot IV contrast low-dose CT—or shall we direct you to the Ultrasound Bistro?”Back To Top
I’ll take a single-shot IV contrast low-dose CT!. Appl Radiol.